Saturday, May 20, 2017

Social Learning - it's what the Internet is for (CoETaIL blog tour)


“Is this the latest version of Windows movie maker?” Freddie asks me in class. “What is the population of Luxembourg?” Marie wants to know. TWIF I tell each of them. They know what I mean; they’ve heard it before.


[caption id="attachment_226" align="aligncenter" width="300"]just twif it made on festisite.com[/caption]

In answer to questions like these, others say sarcastically: “Just let me Google that for you“. The point is that the reliable and accurate answers to these questions are available to anyone in almost an instant. We no longer have to ask the teacher. TWIF stands for: That’s What the Internet is For. Just twif it, I tell the kids. And they get it.

New technology has changed our relationship with knowledge itself. Our students have access to every resource. No wonder some argue that teachers will become redundant. And yet…


…every school I have worked in looks quite like the one I went to during the industrial revolution (well, Leeds in the 1970s). Grades, tests, insular subjects, content-focused teachers. Of course, there are pockets of creativity, but they don’t add up to a bag of innovation. It’s really difficult to change things; even difficult to imagine what it would look like if they were changed on a grand scale.


There is always more than one way of looking at things.


You might sign up for CoETaIL because you’re interested in the challenges of education and change. From the start, you are immersed in many of the best ideas about teaching and learning. You join a community which is speaking the same language and asking similar questions. But you will not come away with simple answers.

morpheus-samr-memeIn course 1, we jump right in and investigate models of educational technology. Personally, I believe that SAMR is a useful model, but it is frequently misappropriated. My PLN suggested one I prefer which I wrote about on my CoETaIL blog (Way of the SAMR eye). Making a case is an excellent way to rehearse your understanding. And the comments from the colleagues you are learning with will make you think again: they don’t necessarily agree with you.

If the education we want for our children is critical, creative and collaborative, then our learning must be like that too. Most questions aren’t googleable; instead, they lead to deeper thought and open up possibilities rather than closing them down. Most solutions are improved by the clash and compromise of difficult conversations.


CoETaIL walks this talk. You can question assumptions, express doubts, try out some new ideas, not alone but with fellow learners. If we believe our students should learn socially, then we must too.

3 comments:

  1. Dear Steve,

    I really love TWIF! I usually say something like "why don't you look it up?" But TWIF is clever and cute and I bet it gets kids saying it to each other when someone asks a TWIFable question. That's always my preference--to get them policing each other.

    I also can't stop thinking about how compartmentalize our learning. I blame the major exam focus and I wish more schools had the courage to walk away from them.

    I've been thinking a lot about how we can get kids asking more questions, how we can get them to wonder and be curious. I saw this great video recently about how little kids are full of curiosity. It's embedded in this NY Times article: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/opinion/how-does-life-live.html. I've had fun experimenting with getting my students to ask questions using 3 Act Math (http://wmh3acts.weebly.com/3-act-math.html) and 101 Questions (http://www.101qs.com/index.php).

    Thanks for sharing and reminding me how much I'm enjoying this course.

    Best,
    Valerie

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Steve,

    I agree with Valerie I like TWIF. Never heard of that one before. Also that the current education model is starting to change but maybe to slowly and in isolated pockets.

    Your point about questions and what is googleable and what is not is important. I have been thinking about it from the perspective of what is a "good" question and how we as teachers can develop our questioning skills. How can we ask the questions that challenge students. That like you say stimulate "deeper thought and open up possibilities rather than closing them down". One method that has helped me is that of mediative questions. This method not only focuses on the question but also it's delivery.
    Invitational: approachable voice, plural forms, tentative language, open ended, embedded positive presuppositions.
    Engage specific cognitive operations: Input, process, output (Blooms verbs)
    Intentional: specific or board depending on the need.

    Thanks for TWIF!

    Brendon

    ReplyDelete
  3. TWIF is a very efficient debunker of many bad lesson plans and so-called research projects. If a meaningful question is being asked, TWIF will not work. It is a great test. Thanks for bringing TWIF into the world, Steve.

    ReplyDelete